Free Advice Hotline: 1800 810 807

Search
PHCostsAssist Login
LinkedinTwitter
Pattison HardmanPattison Hardman
Pattison Hardman
Legal Costs Consultants | Legal Costing Services
  • About
  • Our Services
    • Bill Of Costs
      • Party/Party Costs
      • Indemnity Costs
      • Solicitor Client Costs
      • Objections and Concessions
      • Taxation
    • Expert Evidence
      • Security of Costs
      • Gross Lump Sum Costs Orders
      • Independent Assessments
    • Cost Consultancy
      • Review of internal cost structures
      • Advice on large-scale litigation
      • Insolvency litigation
      • Insurance litigation
      • Class Actions
      • Government
    • Costs Recovery
  • Our Team
    • Suzanne Ward
    • Charles Ackroyd
    • Paul Taylor
    • Daniel Taylor
    • Katie Cerexhe
    • Suzanne Krieke
    • Kate Chan
    • Alison Eddy
    • David Swain
  • Cases & Articles
  • CLE
  • PHCostsAssist
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

DEATH, PROBATE, ADMINISTRATION AND SOLICITOR’S COSTS

June 23, 2017Legal Costs Articles
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail
Print Print

The Grant of Probate and administering the estate of a deceased estate is often common legal work for solicitors.  However, since December 1987 the costs of obtaining a grant of probate are regulated and as such often brings into issues in respect of charging for costs  and disclosure obligations when the solicitor undertakes significant work in administering the estate as an adjunct to obtaining the grant of probate.  Can and how does the solicitor claim for the fixed costs and those costs that go to pure administration of the estate?

Section 59 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act (“the Application Act”) and clause 26 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Regulations (“LPULR”) applies to costs of legal services provided in respect of the granting of probate or administration, or resealing probate or letters of administration.

However, it does not apply to legal services provided for any other aspect of the administration of the estate.

This means that solicitors must identify the legislation relevant to their matter for the purposes of disclosure and billing.  Solicitors must keep to the forefront that:

  • The regulated costs under section 59 of the Application Act are prescribed solicitor/own client. This means that practitioners are bound by the regulated amounts in all instances but disclosure must still be made under Part 43 of the Uniform Law.
  • Costs in relation to administration of assets of the estate and of passing accounts are deregulated. This means that a solicitor can charge in accordance with its disclosure and costs agreement as he or she would in any other matter.
  • Solicitors are permitted to increase fees by l0% of the amount payable for the legal or other service governed by the scales or the amounts permitted by the New Tax System Price Exploitation Law, whichever is less: clause 27 of the LPULR.

All this means you must need to be able to identify what work relates to the fixed or lump sum costs as regulated under the scale and that is costs for obtaining for Obtaining Grant of Probate.  This costs for the lump sum or fixed costs include:

(a)        instructions on obtaining a grant of probate or letters of administration;

(b)        attendance to verify details of assets as supplied by executor (where required);

(c)        preparation of all court documents;

(d)        attendance on executor to sign;

(e)        answering requisitions from the Supreme Court;

(f)         perusing grant and advising executor; but not including any fees (including valuation, advertising and filing fees);

(g)        lodging documents.

The work that is not included in obtaining the Grant or Administration is:

(a)        sorting through estate papers and items;

(b)        advising on taxation and meeting the requirements of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation including preparation of returns;

(c)        obtaining valuations/appraisals of assets/debts;

(d)        ascertaining whether certain assets form part of the estate (e.g. considering trust relationships. superannuation, insurance etc);

(e)        advice on the rights of other parties to challenge the will;

(f)        advice on complex questions of interpretation of the will;

(g)        advising on questions of informal wills, rectification, capacity, duress, undue influence   and forgery.

So in summary when drawing your tax invoice you need to ensure that any work that fits into the lump sum scale is not double charged in the deregulated costs of administering the estate, otherwise the consequences could result in more than an issue on assessment. Further a practitioner needs to disclose on both basis how he or she will charge the client in the costs agreement.

Share on TwitterTweet
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail
Print Print
Related posts
“From an instructing solicitor’s point of view, if such cancellation fees are sought from barristers, it would be prudent for the solicitor to require the client to enter into a separate agreement direct with the barrister or alternatively require the barrister to indemnify the solicitor against any repayment of fees…should the cancellation fee be challenged.”
July 6, 2018
12 MONTH LIMITATION ON ASSESSMENT OF SOLICITOR CLIENT COSTS
April 16, 2018
Interest on Party Party Costs
July 21, 2017
Itemized Bill of Costs – Solicitor’s Duties to Provide itemised bills to their Client
May 26, 2017
Cautionary tale for solicitors who hold money on trust in Family Law proceedings
March 17, 2017
BARRISTER’S CANCELLATION FEES – PAYMENT FOR ONE’S NON-SERVICE!
February 3, 2017
Search Cases & Articles
Categories
  • Costs Cases(52)
  • Expert Costing Evidence(3)
  • Legal Costs Articles(20)
  • News, Thoughts and Jargon(15)
  • Uncategorized(4)
Recent Cases, Articles & Publications
  • Gross lump sum costs order (Federal Court of Australia)
    August 11, 2006
  • New disclosure requirements and the indemnity principle
    December 30, 2006
  • Rejection hurts
    April 30, 2007
  • Legal Costs: an end to the wrangling
    May 30, 2007
  • Costs Restrictions in the Local Court
    October 30, 2007
Our Latest Posts
  • “From an instructing solicitor’s point of view, if such cancellation fees are sought from barristers, it would be prudent for the solicitor to require the client to enter into a separate agreement direct with the barrister or alternatively require the barrister to indemnify the solicitor against any repayment of fees…should the cancellation fee be challenged.”
    July 6, 2018
  • 12 MONTH LIMITATION ON ASSESSMENT OF SOLICITOR CLIENT COSTS
    April 16, 2018
  • Interest on Party Party Costs
    July 21, 2017
  • About Pattison Hardman
  • Our Services
  • Our Team
  • Cases & Articles
  • PHCostsAssist
  • Contact
  • Log In
Contact Us
Free Advice Hotline: 1800 810 807

T: 02 9692 9111
F: 02 9692 9633
E: info@pattisonhardman.com.au

Level 4 10 Park Road Hurstville NSW 2220

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinWebsite
© Copyright 2015 Pattison Hardman Pty Ltd | All Rights Reserved | Website By Stella Design

The recognised leader in quality legal costing since 1988